Free · No account · No card
Why did your Make.com scenario fail?
Paste the error. You get the cause, the steps to fix it, and a link to Make's own documentation behind every claim — so you can check us instead of trusting us.
What comes back
An actual answer, not a summary of the internet.
This is a real response from the engine, copied unedited. Note the block at the bottom: the documentation pages it was built from, linked, so you can go and check every sentence above them.
BundleValidationError: Validation failed for 1 parameter(s). Missing value of required parameter 'values'. Google Sheets — Add a Row, the scenario stops on every run.
Diagnosis — confidence high
Cause
A module outputs the BundleValidationError when the bundle that enters the module doesn't pass validation. Validation means that before processing a bundle in a module, Make checks whether data types match in the module mappings and whether there are no missing values in the module required fields.
What to do
- Review your mapping in the module settings.
- To keep your scenario running even when the error happens, you can use error handlers such as the Skip error handler, Resume error handler, or Rollback error handler.
- Right-click the module that is causing the error.
- Select Add an error handler.
- From the list of error handlers, select the desired error handler.
Sources — every claim above comes from here
And when it cannot answer, it looks different on purpose. The card turns red, the verdict reads "We don't know", and instead of a cause you get a list of what is missing. No diagnosis is dressed up as a maybe.
Who this is for
You build Make scenarios. One just broke.
Eviverse is for the person staring at an incomplete execution — not for Make.com, not for a sales call, not for a general chatbot.
Right now — free diagnosis
Paste the error. Get the cause, steps, and Make's official docs behind every claim. No account. When we do not know, we say so.
Next — monitoring (waitlist)
Same diagnosis, triggered when a scenario fails — before a client tells you. Read-only Make access. Not built yet; the waitlist is how we measure whether to build it.
Not for you if…
You want an AI that invents a fix with confidence, a Zapier/n8n tool (Make only today), or someone on the phone. That is outside the product on purpose.
How it works
Three steps, about ten seconds.
Paste the error
Straight from the Make execution log. The whole thing, including the noisy parts — secrets are removed on our side before anything is sent anywhere.
It searches Make's documentation
Not the web. A knowledge base of 358 records built from Make's official docs, searched by meaning as well as by exact error code.
You get an answer, or an honest no
Cause, numbered steps, and the source pages. Or, when the documentation does not cover it, a plain statement that it does not — and what is missing.
Against what you would do otherwise
Most answers sound right. That is exactly what costs you the hour.
Paste a Make error into a general assistant and you get a confident answer assembled from its memory of the internet — including forum posts about module versions retired two years ago. It is often correct. When it is wrong, it is wrong with the very same confidence.
| Eviverse | General AI assistant | Make's own error email | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the answer comes from | Make's official docsand nothing else | Its memory of the internetforums, blogs, old versions | No answer at allit reports, it does not explain |
| Tells you the cause | Yes | Usually | No |
| You can verify it yourself | Every claim links to its page | No sources, or invented ones | Nothing to verify |
| Admits when it does not know | Yes, and the rate is published1 confirmed miss in 93 held-out cases | Rarely — it answers anyway | Not applicable |
| Knows your Make version is current | Docs are dated, stale ones flagged | No way to tell | Yes |
| Cost | Free, no account | Free to $29/month | Included with Make |
The row that matters is the third one. Every other row is a question of degree; that one is the difference between an answer you can check and an answer you have to believe.
What it covers
Make.com errors, and deliberately nothing else.
A narrow tool that knows one thing well beats a broad one that half-knows everything. If your error is in this list, the answer is very likely already in the base. If it is not, the engine tells you so rather than improvising.
Execution & data
- BundleValidationError
- DataError
- IncompleteDataError
- DuplicateDataError
- InconsistencyError
- RuntimeError
- ExecutionInterruptedError
- UnknownError
Connections & access
- ConnectionError
- InvalidAccessTokenError
- InvalidConfigurationError
- 401
- 403
Limits & quotas
- RateLimitError
- OperationsLimitExceededError
- DataSizeLimitExceededError
- OutOfSpaceError
- 429
Make internal codes
- IM001
- IM002
- IM003
- IM004
- IM005
- IM011
- IM013
- IM016
- IM102
- IM301
- IM903
Beyond the codes, the base covers the three situations that actually break a scenario: a scenario that stops or misbehaves, a connection or permission that no longer works, and a procedure you cannot find in the docs. Anything outside Make.com is out of scope, on purpose.
Guides for common failures
Short pages on errors people search for — then paste your log into the tool above when you have it.
- BundleValidationError on Google Sheets in Make.com
- RateLimitError and 429 in Make.com
- InvalidAccessTokenError and expired Make.com connections
- Incomplete executions in Make.com
Why believe any of this
We publish how often it gets it wrong.
Anyone can claim accuracy. So here is the test we actually run: 93 real cases were pulled out of the knowledge base and never used to tune anything. The engine is then asked about them, knowing it cannot possibly hold the answer. The honest response is "I don't know" — and on 1 of the 93 it answered anyway.
records built from Make's official documentation, each traceable to the page it came from
cases deliberately removed from that base and never used to tune anything, then asked back
of those where it answered instead of admitting it could not. We publish this rather than hide it
It is not always right, and it is not sold as though it were. Check the linked sources — that is what they are for. Measured on 2026-07-31 against cases the engine had never seen. These figures will move as the knowledge base grows, and they will keep being published either way.
The part this page cannot fix
You still have to notice the failure yourself.
Everything above waits for you. You find out the way everyone finds out: a client asks why they never got the invoice, or the spreadsheet is empty on Monday and has been since Thursday. The failure is not the expensive part — the delay before you know about it is.
Eviverse Monitoring
Connects to your Make account read-only, catches the failed execution, and sends you this same diagnosis before anyone has to tell you. $19/month for the first 50 accounts — not built yet, and the page says so plainly.
Questions