Eviverse

Eviverse Monitoring · not built yet

Know your scenario broke before your client does.

Eviverse watches your Make account read-only, catches the failed execution, and sends you the diagnosis — cause, steps, and the documentation behind each claim. Not an alert telling you to go and look.

Read-only, never writes Sources on every diagnosis Says "I don't know" instead of guessing

The real cost

The failure is not the expensive part. The delay is.

A scenario breaking is a five-minute fix. Finding out four days later, after 200 records never synced and a client had to ask, is the part that actually costs you — in refunds, in rework, and in the sentence "I hadn't noticed."

Make emails you. That is all it does.

The notification says an execution failed. It does not say why, does not say what to do, and by the third one this week you have stopped opening them.

So you check manually. Sometimes.

Opening the Make dashboard to scan execution histories is a task nobody schedules and everybody skips on the day it would have mattered.

Or you find out from someone else.

A client, a colleague, an empty report. The failure was Thursday; the conversation is Monday. Everything in between is unrecoverable.

How it works

Connect once. Then it is out of your hands.

No agent to install, nothing added to your scenarios, no change to how they run. Eviverse reads Make's API from the outside — your scenarios do not know it exists.

You connect Make

Once, read-only. Takes a minute and needs no change to any scenario.

A scenario fails

At 3am, on a Sunday, on the one you had forgotten about.

Eviverse diagnoses it

Against 358 records from Make's official documentation.

You get the answer

Cause, steps and sources — or an honest "the docs don't cover this".

Read-only is not a preference, it is the design. Eviverse can see that an execution failed and read the error it produced. It cannot create, modify, run or delete anything, and it does not touch the data flowing through your scenarios.

What is included

Written as two lists, because only one of them is a promise.

It would be easy to print the second list as features. It is not built, and neither is the first list yet — presenting them the same way would be a lie by layout.

In the first version

  • Read-only watch on every scenario in your account
  • Automatic diagnosis on failure, source pages linked
  • Email that contains the answer, not a notification telling you to go look
  • An honest "I don't know" when the documentation falls short — same rule as the free tool
  • A history of what broke, when, and what the cause was

Considered, not promised

  • Delivery to Slack or Discord instead of email
  • Grouping repeated failures, so one broken scenario sends one message and not forty
  • A weekly summary of which scenarios are becoming fragile

These get built if the people on the list ask for them. That is most of what the list is for.

Honestly

Worth it for some people, not for everyone.

A tool that claims to suit everybody suits nobody. Here is who this is built for — and who should keep using the free diagnosis and pay nothing.

Worth paying for if

  • You run Make scenarios other people depend on — clients, colleagues, customers
  • A silent failure costs you real money, or an awkward conversation
  • You have more scenarios than you can watch by hand
  • You have found out about a break from someone else at least once

Not worth it if

  • You have two or three scenarios and would notice within the hour
  • Your scenarios are personal, and a day of delay costs nothing
  • You already have monitoring you trust and actually read
  • You only need an answer now and then — the free tool stays free

Why believe the diagnosis

The engine is already running. We publish how often it is wrong.

Monitoring is the delivery mechanism; the diagnosis behind it is live today and you can test it yourself in ten seconds. On 5 of 93 held-out cases it answered instead of admitting it could not.

358

records built from Make's official documentation, each traceable to its page

93

cases removed from that base and never used to tune anything, then asked back

5 / 93

where it answered instead of admitting it could not. Published rather than hidden

Pricing

One price. No tiers, no per-scenario counting.

The free diagnosis stays free forever. Monitoring is the paid part, and it costs less than one hour spent hunting for the cause yourself.

Founding price · first 50 accounts
$19$29/ month, locked for as long as you stay

Cancel whenever. There is no contract to get out of.

  • Read-only monitoring of every scenario in your Make account
  • A full diagnosis when one fails, not just an alert
  • Sources linked on every answer, same as the free tool
  • An explicit "I don't know" when the documentation falls short
  • The founding price stays yours as the product grows

This is not built yet, and I would rather say so than imply otherwise. There is nothing to pay today and no card to enter. Leaving your address locks $19/month for you when it ships, and tells me whether to build it at all. If not enough people do, I will not build it — and I will write and tell you that, rather than going quiet.

Who is building this

One person, and no investors to please.

I'm Ethan. I build Eviverse alone. That is worth knowing before you leave your address, because it explains the two things that are unusual about this page.

First, why the error rate is printed above. A company with a sales team would round it away. I would rather you find out here than after trusting a wrong answer — the whole product rests on refusing to answer when it should, and that promise is worthless if I hide the times it fails.

Second, why this is a waiting list and not a checkout. Charging for something that does not exist, then racing to build it, is how people end up shipping something they would not use themselves. The list tells me whether it is worth building. If it is, the people on it pay $19 instead of $29, permanently, for having been early enough to be useful.

Questions, or a Make error the engine got wrong? Write to me — [email protected]. A wrong answer is genuinely useful to me: it is how the knowledge base gets fixed.

Questions

Straight answers

Two things you can do right now.

If a scenario is broken today, paste the error — free, no account. If the expensive part is finding out too late, lock the founding price below.

Nothing to pay. No card. One email when it ships, and none in between.